In the face of new information, there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie's account, and we have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced. We were trying to be sensitive to the unfair shame and humiliation many women feel after a sexual assault and now regret the decision to not contact the alleged assaulters to get their account. We are taking this seriously and apologize to anyone who was affected by the story.Really, Rolling Stone? Do you have no journalistic standards at all? You didn't think about the fact that this story would be a massive bombshell? That it would be taken as the poster child for a larger problem, and that by not getting it right, you'd be handing ammunition to those who deny the larger problem? That by having to now say you're not sure of the truth, you are putting the victim, if she is a victim, through a new hell? Or conversely, that you damaged reputations in irreparable ways, if in fact the accused were innocent or perhaps never existed?
One thing is certain: By shilly-shallying, you've set the fight against rape culture on campus back years. Screw you.
Following up on my last post, From U of P, 1980, to UVA, 2014:
So the president of the University of Virginia, Teresa Sullivan, made a speech in response to the Rolling Stone rape story.
Is UVA closing the frats?
How do you spell “privilege”? I’m pretty sure you spell it in GREEK.
When do the universities stop putting their institutional interest in pandering to rich frat alumni over the safety of their students?
When does the idea finally sink in that fraternities don’t just have a rape problem, they are built on a foundation of rape culture?
When do they take note of the fact that the kind of thing that came out in the Rolling Stone story has been going on in frats all over the country for DECADES, regardless of efforts to reform the system?
How many more chances do fraternities get?
When is enough enough?